Volkswagen Polo 2015 vs Skoda Fabia 2015
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 15 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 7 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 4.7 | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 40 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 130 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`564 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |