Volkswagen Polo 2015 vs Nissan Juke 2014
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 85 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 87 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.0 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.57 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 26 cm longer than the Nissan Juke, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 797 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Polo has 106 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Juke, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 10 200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 9.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |