Volkswagen Polo 2015 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 67 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Volkswagen Passat CC. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.4 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Passat CC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 72 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 150 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |