Volkswagen Polo 2015 vs Peugeot 301 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 301 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 30 HP less power than Peugeot 301, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Peugeot 301. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.5 | |
| Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 301, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm shorter than the Peugeot 301, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1332 litres | |
|
Peugeot 301 has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 46 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 301. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`524 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Peugeot 301 has
| |