Volkswagen Polo 2015 vs Fiat Tipo 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Tipo is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 10 HP less power than Fiat Tipo, but torque is 18 NM more than Fiat Tipo. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.7 | |
|
The Fiat Tipo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Tipo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Polo could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is smaller. Volkswagen Polo is 14 cm shorter than the Fiat Tipo, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 520 litres | |
|
Fiat Tipo has more luggage space. Volkswagen Polo has 60 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Tipo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Tipo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Fiat Tipo has
| |