Volkswagen Polo 2015 vs Dacia Logan 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 104 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 10 HP more power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.6 | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Polo consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Polo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 163 mm (6.4 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
| Volkswagen Polo is 4 cm longer than the Dacia Logan, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Polo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`660 kg | 1`562 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`163 kg | 974 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 497 kg | 588 kg | |
| Volkswagen Polo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem less than Dacia Logan. Therefore, Dacia Logan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |