Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo 2009 is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Polo 2009 engine produces 15 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo 2009, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Polo 2009 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2009 and Volkswagen Polo 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |