Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Polo 2009 and Volkswagen Polo 2009 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.97 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo 2009 and Volkswagen Polo 2009 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.4/10 | 6.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Polo has
|
| |