Volkswagen Polo 2009 vs Ford Fiesta 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 204 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
Ford Fiesta is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Polo engine produces 15 HP less power than Ford Fiesta, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Ford Fiesta. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Polo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
1250 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
950 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.97 m | 3.95 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 295 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 979 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Polo has 15 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. This could mean that the Volkswagen Polo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Fiesta (by 27 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`650 | 1`555 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | average | |
Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Fiesta, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 4000 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |