Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Ford Fiesta 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Polo
2001 - 2005
Ford Fiesta
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.91.2 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 55 - 100 HP68 - 100 HP
Torque: 106 - 240 NM106 - 204 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 - 17.5 seconds10.6 - 15.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 7.44.3 - 7.5
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.90 m3.92 m
Width: 1.65 m1.68 m
Height: 1.46 m1.46 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 270 litres284 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1030 litres947 litres
Volkswagen Polo has 14 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 83 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`530~ 1`540
Safety:
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 16001200
Pros and Cons:
    Ford Fiesta has
    • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
    • roomier boot
    • better manoeuvrability
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv