Volkswagen Polo 2001 vs Ford Fiesta 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 100 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 - 240 NM | 106 - 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | 10.6 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.4 | 4.3 - 7.5 | |
|
Volkswagen Polo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Volkswagen Polo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.90 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Polo is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 270 litres | 284 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1030 litres | 947 litres | |
| Volkswagen Polo has 14 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 83 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Polo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Volkswagen Polo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`530 | ~ 1`540 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |