Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Smart ForFour 2004

Volkswagen Lupo
1998 - 2005
Smart ForFour
2004 - 2006
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Diesel1.5 Diesel
Power: 60 HP68 HP
Torque: 115 NM160 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.8 seconds13.9 seconds
Volkswagen Lupo engine produces 8 HP less power than Smart ForFour, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Smart ForFour. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Lupo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later.
Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.6
Real fuel consumption: 4.7 l/100km5.3 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForFour, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Lupo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Lupo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForFour.
Fuel tank capacity: 34 litres47 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle1020 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway1200 km on highway
720 km with real consumption880 km with real consumption
Length: 3.53 m3.75 m
Width: 1.64 m1.68 m
Height: 1.46 m1.45 m
Volkswagen Lupo is 22 cm shorter than the Smart ForFour, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Smart ForFour, which means Volkswagen Lupo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 800750
above average

According to annual technical inspection data Smart ForFour has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Lupo, so Volkswagen Lupo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 12002000
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Contact us: [email protected]