Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Smart ForFour 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Lupo
1998 - 2005
Smart ForFour
2004 - 2006
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 1.71.1 - 1.5

Performance

Power: 50 - 125 HP64 - 177 HP
Torque: 86 - 195 NM92 - 230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 - 17.7 seconds6.9 - 15.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 3.0 - 7.54.6 - 6.8
Volkswagen Lupo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Smart ForFour. On average, Volkswagen Lupo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForFour.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.53 m3.75 m
Width: 1.64 m1.68 m
Height: 1.46 m1.45 m
Volkswagen Lupo is smaller, but slightly higher.
Volkswagen Lupo is 22 cm shorter than the Smart ForFour, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 130 litres268 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
860 litres910 litres
Smart ForFour has more luggage space.
Volkswagen Lupo has 138 litres less trunk space than the Smart ForFour. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Smart ForFour (by 50 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Smart ForFour.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`368~ 1`450
Safety:
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 12002000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Lupo has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Smart ForFour has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv