Volkswagen Lupo 1998 vs Smart ForFour 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.7 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 50 - 125 HP | 64 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 86 - 195 NM | 92 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 17.7 seconds | 6.9 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.0 - 7.5 | 4.6 - 6.8 | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Smart ForFour. On average, Volkswagen Lupo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Smart ForFour. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.53 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volkswagen Lupo is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Lupo is 22 cm shorter than the Smart ForFour, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Lupo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 130 litres | 268 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
860 litres | 910 litres | |
|
Smart ForFour has more luggage space. Volkswagen Lupo has 138 litres less trunk space than the Smart ForFour. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Smart ForFour (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Lupo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Smart ForFour. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`368 | ~ 1`450 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Lupo has
|
Smart ForFour has
| |