Volkswagen Golf 1999 vs Toyota Avensis 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 147 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 196 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
Toyota Avensis is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Golf engine produces 32 HP less power than Toyota Avensis, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Toyota Avensis. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Golf over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Golf consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
700 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Avensis gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Volkswagen Bora, Volkswagen Beetle | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Avensis Verso | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The Volkswagen Golf engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Toyota Avensis 2003 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota Avensis 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.52 m | |
Volkswagen Golf is smaller. Volkswagen Golf is 30 cm shorter than the Toyota Avensis, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Golf is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1470 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres less than that of the Toyota Avensis. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`810 | 1`400 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | high | |
Toyota Avensis has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota Avensis, so Toyota Avensis quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Golf has
|
Toyota Avensis has
| |