Volkswagen Golf 2017 vs Volkswagen Polo 2018

 
Volkswagen Golf
2017 - 2019
Volkswagen Polo
2018 - 2020
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 310 HP200 HP
Torque: 400 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.6 seconds6.7 seconds
Volkswagen Golf is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Golf engine produces 110 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Golf reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.0no data
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres40 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Ground clearance: 128 mm (5 inches)143 mm (5.6 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Polo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Polo version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.26 m4.05 m
Width: 1.79 m1.75 m
Height: 1.44 m1.44 m
Volkswagen Golf is larger.
Volkswagen Golf is 21 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 343 litres305 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1233 litres1079 litres
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Golf has 38 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Golf (by 154 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Golf is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo.
Gross weight: 2`020 kg1`780 kg
Net weight:1`430 kg1`355 kg
Load capacity:590 kg425 kg
Volkswagen Golf load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem more than Volkswagen Polo. Therefore, Volkswagen Golf is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Golf has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 12 4008400
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Golf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Volkswagen Polo has
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv