Toyota RAV4 2006 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 65 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Lexus IS | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1470 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |