Toyota RAV4 2006 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 37 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.7 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 24 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 541 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1470 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 45 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 221 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |