Toyota RAV4 2006 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Toyota RAV4) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Maverick) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 14 HP less power than Ford Maverick, but torque is 110 NM more than Ford Maverick. Despite less power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 675 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2006: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually with a button on the console. Ford Maverick 2000: The AWD system typically directs the majority of the engine`s power to the front wheels. If slippage is detected at the front, power is quickly redirected to the rear wheels via a Rotary Blade Coupling, which can transfer up to 100% of the power to rear axis. Switching the system from `Auto` to `On` locks the front and rear axles at a 50/50 split and reduces the reaction time needed to engage the rear wheels through an integrated bypass clutch. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2006 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2006 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 985 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1470 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage space. Toyota RAV4 has 399 litres less trunk space than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |