Toyota RAV4 2006 vs Mazda Tribute 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda Tribute is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 2 HP more power than Mazda Tribute, but torque is 6 NM less than Mazda Tribute. Despite the higher power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Avensis Verso | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2006 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2006 2.0 engine Mazda Tribute 2004 2.3 engine: The cooling system pump and thermostat, engine mounts (which can cause vibration), lambda sensor, and intake manifold adjuster are the most common problems with this engine. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda Tribute, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1470 litres | 2245 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 218 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. The Mazda Tribute may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 775 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda Tribute, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |