Toyota RAV4 2003 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 13 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Despite less power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota RAV4 is 21 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1951 litres | |
| Toyota RAV4 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 801 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Toyota RAV4, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |