Toyota RAV4 2003 vs Honda HR-V 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Toyota RAV4) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda HR-V) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 11 HP more power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 115 NM more than Honda HR-V. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is larger. Toyota RAV4 is 15 cm longer than the Honda HR-V, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Toyota RAV4 has 115 litres more trunk space than the Honda HR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |