Toyota RAV4 2003 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Ford Maverick is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 34 HP less power than Ford Maverick, but torque is 50 NM more than Ford Maverick. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2003: Toyota has full-time all wheel drive with viscous coupling locking center differential and can have optional Torsen limited-slip rear differential. Ford Maverick 2000: The AWD system typically directs the majority of the engine`s power to the front wheels. If slippage is detected at the front, power is quickly redirected to the rear wheels via a Rotary Blade Coupling, which can transfer up to 100% of the power to rear axis. Switching the system from `Auto` to `On` locks the front and rear axles at a 50/50 split and reduces the reaction time needed to engage the rear wheels through an integrated bypass clutch. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 18 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 985 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage space. Toyota RAV4 has 585 litres less trunk space than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`930 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |