Toyota RAV4 2003 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 9 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Avensis Verso | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 6 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Toyota RAV4 has 244 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`825 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |