Toyota RAV4 2003 vs Suzuki Jimny 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 65 HP | |
Torque: | 192 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Toyota RAV4 engine produces 85 HP more power than Suzuki Jimny, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Suzuki Jimny. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 6.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
The Suzuki Jimny is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Jimny, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Jimny. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 40 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
560 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Avensis Verso | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 3.64 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.60 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
Toyota RAV4 is larger. Toyota RAV4 is 62 cm longer than the Suzuki Jimny, 18 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Suzuki Jimny, which means Toyota RAV4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`825 | 1`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | above average | |
Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Jimny has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2800 | 5400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Suzuki Jimny has
| |