Toyota RAV4 2003 vs Mazda Tribute 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 192 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Mazda Tribute is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 and Mazda Tribute have the same engine power, but Toyota RAV4 torque is 8 NM less than Mazda Tribute. Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Tribute. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
560 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Avensis Verso | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Tribute might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.26 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 17 cm shorter than the Mazda Tribute, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 368 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 2245 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 32 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Tribute. The Mazda Tribute may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Tribute (by 1095 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda Tribute. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`825 | 1`978 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3000 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mazda Tribute has
| |