Toyota RAV4 2003 vs Kia Sportage 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 18.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 55 HP more power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Kia Sportage. Thanks to more power Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 11.8 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota RAV4 consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.65 m | |
| Toyota RAV4 is 6 cm shorter than the Kia Sportage, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 373 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1150 litres | 1570 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Kia Sportage may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Sportage (by 420 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`825 kg | 1`930 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`380 kg | 1`420 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 445 kg | 510 kg | |
| Toyota RAV4 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Kia Sportage. Therefore, Kia Sportage is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Sportage has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |