Toyota RAV4 2003 vs Nissan X-Trail 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 15 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota RAV4 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Serena, Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2003 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota RAV4 2003 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota RAV4 is 25 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1841 litres | |
| Toyota RAV4 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 691 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |