Toyota RAV4 2012 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Toyota RAV4 engine produces 6 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Toyota RAV4 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota RAV4 could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 187 mm (7.4 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is larger. Toyota RAV4 is 19 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 577 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1705 litres | 1585 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Toyota RAV4 has 147 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 120 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Toyota RAV4 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 10 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |