Toyota RAV4 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 161 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 11 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 9.3 | |
| Toyota RAV4 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 44 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 678 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 153 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 957 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`833 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Toyota RAV4 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |