Toyota RAV4 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 161 HP | 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 224 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota RAV4 engine produces 1 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 4 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.1 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota RAV4 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Toyota RAV4 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Previa, Toyota Camry | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is smaller. Toyota RAV4 is 33 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 678 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 153 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 957 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`833 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Toyota RAV4 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |