Toyota RAV4 2006 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Toyota RAV4 is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Outlander can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi Outlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 - 177 HP | 136 - 220 HP | |
Torque: | 194 - 400 NM | 176 - 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 12 seconds | 7.7 - 11.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 10.3 | 7.5 - 10.6 | |
Toyota RAV4 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. On average, Toyota RAV4 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.60 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
Toyota RAV4 is 20 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota RAV4 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 586 litres | 541 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1470 litres | 1691 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Toyota RAV4 has 45 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 221 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota RAV4 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Toyota RAV4 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`134 | ~ 2`331 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | average | |
Average price (€): | 4800 | 3200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota RAV4 has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |