Toyota Corolla 2004 vs Peugeot 307 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 147 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
Toyota Corolla engine produces 6 HP more power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 133 NM more than Peugeot 307. Despite the higher power, Toyota Corolla reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Corolla consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that by driving the Toyota Corolla over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Corolla consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
1100 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
880 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 307 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Peugeot 307 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Toyota Corolla 2004 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla 2004 2.0 engine Peugeot 307 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 307 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.41 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
Toyota Corolla is smaller. Toyota Corolla is 1 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Corolla is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 340 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1540 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Corolla is 0.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307, which means Toyota Corolla can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`923 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | below average | |
Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 307 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 6.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Corolla has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |