Suzuki Swift 2006 vs Nissan Micra 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 88 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Swift engine produces 4 HP more power than Nissan Micra, but torque is 12 NM less than Nissan Micra. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Swift reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Note, Nissan Cube | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Suzuki Swift is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 198 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
562 litres | 584 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Suzuki Swift has 53 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 22 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Swift is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Suzuki Swift can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`485 | 1`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Nissan Micra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Suzuki Swift, so Nissan Micra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Swift has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |