Subaru Outback 2013 vs Peugeot 508 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 112 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
Subaru Outback is more dynamic to drive. Subaru Outback engine produces 38 HP more power than Peugeot 508, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Peugeot 508. Thanks to more power Subaru Outback reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 4.5 | |
The Peugeot 508 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Subaru Outback consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 508, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Outback could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 72 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 1600 km in combined cycle | |
1140 km on highway | 1750 km on highway | ||
Peugeot 508 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 17 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Peugeot 508 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Peugeot 508 2010 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Peugeot 508 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.48 m | |
Subaru Outback is smaller, but higher. Subaru Outback is 2 cm shorter than the Peugeot 508, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Outback is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 526 litres | 560 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 560 litres | |
Peugeot 508 has more luggage space. Subaru Outback has 34 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 508. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Subaru Outback is 0.9 metres less than that of the Peugeot 508, which means Subaru Outback can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`100 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 17 200 | 4400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Outback has
|
Peugeot 508 has
| |