Subaru Impreza 2003 vs Toyota RAV4 2003

 
Subaru Impreza
2003 - 2005
Toyota RAV4
2003 - 2006
Body: Estate car / wagonCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 225 HP150 HP
Torque: 300 NM192 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 seconds10.6 seconds
Subaru Impreza is more dynamic to drive.
Subaru Impreza engine produces 75 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 108 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.28.8
Real fuel consumption: 10.8 l/100km9.7 l/100km
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Subaru Impreza consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Impreza could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Impreza consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres57 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 540 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
700 km on highway780 km on highway
460 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption
Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Engines

Engine production duration: 9 years14 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Avensis Verso
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect.
Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ...  More about Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.26 m
Width: 1.70 m1.78 m
Height: 1.48 m1.72 m
Subaru Impreza is 16 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Impreza is 24 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data400 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1150 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Subaru Impreza can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`825
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Subaru Impreza has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 22003200
Pros and Cons: Subaru Impreza has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Toyota RAV4 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv