Subaru Impreza 2005 vs Volvo S60 2005

 
Subaru Impreza
2005 - 2007
Volvo S60
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.4 Diesel
Petrol engines (Subaru Impreza) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo S60) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 160 HP185 HP
Torque: 186 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.8 seconds8.2 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Subaru Impreza engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 214 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Subaru Impreza reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.06.6
Real fuel consumption: 9.5 l/100km6.4 l/100km
The Volvo S60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Subaru Impreza consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Subaru Impreza could require 360 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Subaru Impreza consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
630 km with real consumption1090 km with real consumption
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo S60 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 16 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy, Subaru XVInstalled on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Volvo S60 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Subaru Impreza 2005 2.0 engine: The Subaru EJ204 is a naturally aspirated 2.0-liter boxer engine producing around 150–160 hp, widely used in models such as Impreza, Legacy, and Forester between 1999 and 2015. It is generally regarded as a durable engine, but like many units from the EJ ...  More about Subaru Impreza 2005 2.0 engine 

Volvo S60 2005 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular. However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ...  More about Volvo S60 2005 2.4 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.60 m
Width: 1.74 m1.80 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Subaru Impreza is smaller, but slightly higher.
Subaru Impreza is 14 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Impreza is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 401 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Volvo S60 has more luggage space.
Subaru Impreza has 23 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Subaru Impreza is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Subaru Impreza can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7802`030
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 58002400
Pros and Cons: Subaru Impreza has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv