Subaru Forester 2002 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Subaru Forester engine produces 69 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Subaru Forester is larger, but lower. Subaru Forester is 25 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 1 cm wider, while the height of Subaru Forester is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 406 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
| Subaru Forester has 6 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`854 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Subaru Forester has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |