Subaru Forester 2008 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 172 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 229 NM | 224 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Subaru Forester engine produces 2 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.3 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.56 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
Subaru Forester is 16 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 586 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1470 litres | |
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru Forester has 136 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Subaru Forester can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`015 | 2`110 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Toyota RAV4 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Subaru Forester, so Toyota RAV4 quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 3600 | 4800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.7/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |