Subaru Forester 2000 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Subaru Forester is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota RAV4 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 - 170 HP | 116 - 161 HP | |
Torque: | 184 - 240 NM | 161 - 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 12 seconds | 10.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.5 | 7.1 - 9.8 | |
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.59 m | 1.70 m | |
Subaru Forester is 22 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Subaru Forester is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 678 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`650 | ~ 1`836 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |