Subaru Forester 2005 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 - 230 HP | 136 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 - 320 NM | 194 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 - 11.9 seconds | 9.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 10.7 | 6.6 - 10.3 | |
|
Subaru Forester petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.70 m | |
| Subaru Forester is 8 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Subaru Forester is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 387 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1470 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Subaru Forester has 199 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Subaru Forester uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Subaru Forester is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Subaru Forester can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`750 | ~ 2`134 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Subaru Forester has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |