Smart ForTwo 2012 vs Smart ForFour 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Smart ForTwo is available with rear wheel drive, while Smart ForFour can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 0.8 - 1.0 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 54 - 102 HP | 64 - 177 HP | |
Torque: | 89 - 147 NM | 92 - 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 16.8 seconds | 6.9 - 15.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 5.2 | 4.6 - 6.8 | |
Smart ForTwo petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Smart ForFour. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 2.70 m | 3.75 m | |
Width: | 1.56 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.45 m | |
Smart ForTwo is smaller, but higher. Smart ForTwo is 106 cm shorter than the Smart ForFour, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Smart ForTwo is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 268 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 910 litres | |
Smart ForFour has more luggage space. Smart ForTwo has 48 litres less trunk space than the Smart ForFour. | |||
Turning diameter: | 8.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Smart ForTwo is 1.7 metres less than that of the Smart ForFour, which means Smart ForTwo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`035 | ~ 1`450 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 7600 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Smart ForTwo has
|
Smart ForFour has
| |