Skoda Fabia 2005 vs Volvo S40 2005

 
Skoda Fabia
2005 - 2006
Volvo S40
2005 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 69 HP110 HP
Torque: 155 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.8 seconds12 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 41 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.74.9
Real fuel consumption: 5.1 l/100km5.7 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle1260 km in combined cycle
1090 km on highway1470 km on highway
880 km with real consumption1080 km with real consumption
Volvo S40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.47 m
Width: 1.65 m1.77 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller.
Skoda Fabia is 25 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 426 litres404 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
789 litres883 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 22 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The Volvo S40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S40 (by 94 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6751`890
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Volvo S40 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volvo S40, so Volvo S40 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 12002400
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv