Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Volvo S40 2006

 
Skoda Fabia
2004 - 2005
Volvo S40
2006 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 64 HP125 HP
Torque: 125 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 18.3 seconds11 seconds
Volvo S40 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Fabia engine produces 61 HP less power than Volvo S40, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Volvo S40. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.87.4
Real fuel consumption: 4.9 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 930 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
1120 km on highway940 km on highway
910 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption
Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.22 m4.47 m
Width: 1.65 m1.77 m
Height: 1.45 m1.45 m
Skoda Fabia is smaller.
Skoda Fabia is 25 cm shorter than the Volvo S40, 12 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 438 litres404 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
789 litres883 litres
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 34 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The Volvo S40 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S40 (by 94 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6701`850
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Volvo S40 has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Fabia, so Volvo S40 quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 12002400
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Skoda Fabia has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo S40 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv