Skoda Fabia 2004 vs Peugeot 307 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia engine produces 35 HP less power than Peugeot 307, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Peugeot 307. Despite less power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.1 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307, which means that by driving the Skoda Fabia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 307. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 307 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Peugeot 307 2004 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Peugeot 307 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.22 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller. Skoda Fabia is 20 cm shorter than the Peugeot 307, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 426 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1225 litres | 1540 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Fabia has 86 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 307. The Peugeot 307 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 307 (by 315 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 307, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`695 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Peugeot 307, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 6.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Peugeot 307 has
| |