Skoda Fabia 2010 vs Volkswagen Polo 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 195 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Fabia engine produces 15 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
1250 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Volkswagen Polo | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3, Skoda Fabia, Skoda Roomster | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Polo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Skoda Fabia 2010 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Skoda Fabia 2010 1.6 engine Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Volkswagen Polo 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.00 m | 3.97 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.49 m | |
Skoda Fabia is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 280 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`659 | 1`650 | |
Safety: | |||
Volkswagen Polo is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3000 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |