Skoda Fabia 2018 vs Renault Megane 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Fabia) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Renault Megane) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Skoda Fabia and Renault Megane have the same engine power, but Skoda Fabia torque is 60 NM less than Renault Megane. Skoda Fabia reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Fabia consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Fabia could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Fabia consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Skoda Fabia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Fabia is 36 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Fabia is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1395 litres | 1504 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Fabia is 1.6 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Skoda Fabia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`640 kg | 1`914 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`110 kg | 1`312 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 530 kg | 602 kg | |
| Skoda Fabia load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Renault Megane. Therefore, Renault Megane is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Skoda Fabia has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Skoda Fabia, so Skoda Fabia quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Fabia has
|
Renault Megane has
| |