Seat Leon 2013 vs Renault Megane 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Leon is more dynamic to drive. Seat Leon engine produces 40 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Seat Leon reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 3.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.5 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Seat Leon consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Seat Leon could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Seat Leon consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Seat Leon is 9 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, width is practically the same , while the height of Seat Leon is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 587 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1504 litres | |
|
Seat Leon has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Seat Leon has 66 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The Renault Megane may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Seat Leon is 1.8 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Seat Leon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 1`914 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Renault Megane has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Leon has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Renault Megane, so Renault Megane quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Seat Leon has
|
Renault Megane has
| |