SAAB 9-5 1999 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
SAAB 9-5 is available with front wheel drive, while Ford Scorpio can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 230 HP | 115 - 207 HP | |
Torque: | 240 - 350 NM | 167 - 281 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 12.5 seconds | 9.2 - 13.4 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.4 | 8.5 - 12.8 | |
SAAB 9-5 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Scorpio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.83 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
SAAB 9-5 is smaller, but higher. SAAB 9-5 is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 8 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-5 is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-5 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means SAAB 9-5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`800 | ~ 1`726 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-5 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |