SAAB 9-3 1998 vs Nissan 200 SX 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
SAAB 9-3 is available with front wheel drive, while Nissan 200 SX can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. SAAB 9-3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 225 HP | 200 HP | |
Torque: | 177 - 342 NM | 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 13 seconds | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 10.8 | 8.8 - 8.9 | |
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.30 m | |
SAAB 9-3 is 11 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 2 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 307 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX, which means SAAB 9-3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`780 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |