Rover 75 2004 vs Toyota Avensis 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Avensis is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 and Toyota Avensis have the same engine power, but Rover 75 torque is 20 NM less than Toyota Avensis. Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.0 | |
|
The Toyota Avensis is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Avensis, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Avensis 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Avensis 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but lower. Rover 75 is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Avensis, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1222 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Avensis. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Avensis has
| |